Feedback

Send an eMail to kev at footypedia dot com if you like. Just note that I've spaced out and phoeneticised the address printed in this sentence, just to flummox the dodgy eMail harvesters that keep reminding me how I'm out of Viarga!

Important Notes :
The following terms were first displayed on Thursday, March 4th, 2004. If you submitted something prior, and are now concerned that it is represented on the site, please contact me on the address above.

Use of Information :
- It is assumed that football-related information sent to footypedia is intended to be available for footypedia to represent through publication on this site. Footypedia does not claim ownership of information sent, but it does claim the right to represent the information on the footypedia website. If you send it, you've told me I can use it!. When sending information, it is also useful to be aware of footypedia's approach towards the issue of copyright for information represented on the site. It would serve well for the contributor to know what footypedia is recommending site visitors do with their information.

Inappropriate Publishing Indemnity :
- Footypedia is therefore indemnified from the results of representing submitted data. Of course, footypedia takes due care to ascertain if information might be sensitive, and to either exclude sensitive information, or to enquire with the sender before publishing it. An example of sensitive information might be details of a league finding against a club that might be, justifiably or not, a charge which damages that club's reputation.

Acknowledgement :
- Footypedia sometimes chooses to credit the sender by adding a reference to them on the acknowledgements page. Footypedia always consults the sender before doing so. Acknowledgement is not always offered due to the vast amount of information coming in, and the scarcity of time available. Senders are welcome to request ackowledgement, and in almost all cases this will be honoured. Obviously, 'Your site sucks. Please add me to the acknowledgements' might struggle to make the cut. The 'what folks say' section on the homepage is subject to the same approach.